Why did Rabulla make his own Aramaic gospels?

[byrnesey]

Why did Rabbula do it? I think if you read item #16 in the following article, you may be able to form your own opinions as to why theologians from the Monophysite tradition did not like the Peshitta:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://syrcom.cua.edu/Hugoye/Vol7No1/HV7N1VanRompay.html">http://syrcom.cua.edu/Hugoye/Vol7No1/HV ... ompay.html</a><!-- m -->

As you know, Philoxenus went on to create his own version from the Greek. I'm sure you can agree, the motivation for him to do so is quite clear.

I do not find it clear at all. That would explain why SOC and so forth used Peshitto rather than Peshitta. So the real question then becomes, why did Rabulla create a "new" set of Aramaic Gospels instead of using the PeshittO Gospels already used by the SOC? As I explained earlier, it is irrelivant as there is enough evidence for Peshitta originality over the Greek and the OS, but it still would be nice to know.[/code]