Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Juckel's study
#10
Paul Younan Wrote:Shlama Akhi Yuri,

I'm simply quoting the author himself.

Shlama Akhi Paul,

Well, actually, the author said that about the Pauline manuscripts, and not about the gospel MSS. The textual situation with the Pauline MSS is very different, as compared to gospel MSS.

Paul Younan Wrote:Why should I care about what variants "Phillipps 1388" has - with THAT type of tampering going on in the western tradition?

Well, I don't think that the Phillipps 1388 MS is all that different from any other old Aramaic MSS. This is what Juckel said in his article...

Paul Younan Wrote:Give me some eastern variants! Or, aren't there any?

Akhi - out of the 42 manuscripts used by Gwilliam and Pusey in their critical apparatus - do you happen to know how many were eastern? If not, I'll give you a clue - you can count them with one hand if you cut off 2 fingers.

And, all 3 of those agree in reading.

So, we are still waiting for Peshitta variants. <!-- sSmile --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /><!-- sSmile -->

Sorry, akhi, but I'm getting more and more mystified. Gwilliam and Pusey used the total of 42 manuscripts for their authoritative edition of the Aramaic gospels. And now you're saying that only 3 of them were quality MSS, and the 39 were defective?

Gwilliam and Pusey must have been terribly incompetent to use such worthless MSS for their edition? Why didn't they use more of the excellent MSS such as the 3 that you've mentioned?

In any case, what are the numbers of these 3 Eastern MSS in Gwilliam/Pusey catalogue? Maybe I can find some variants there as well?

But, so far, based on what you're saying, it seems like, in general, old Aramaic manuscripts of the gospels must be rather corrupt (39 out of 42?)...

Best wishes,

Yuri.
Yuri Kuchinsky | Toronto | <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.trends.ca/~yuku/bbl/bbl.htm">http://www.trends.ca/~yuku/bbl/bbl.htm</a><!-- m -->
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Juckel's study - by yuku - 04-20-2004, 08:17 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-20-2004, 08:50 PM
[No subject] - by yuku - 04-20-2004, 09:27 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-20-2004, 09:36 PM
[No subject] - by abudar2000 - 04-21-2004, 01:09 AM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-21-2004, 01:57 AM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-21-2004, 02:44 AM
[No subject] - by abudar2000 - 04-21-2004, 03:56 AM
[No subject] - by abudar2000 - 04-21-2004, 04:06 AM
[No subject] - by yuku - 04-21-2004, 06:13 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-22-2004, 01:41 AM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-22-2004, 08:03 PM
[No subject] - by yuku - 04-23-2004, 05:47 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-23-2004, 05:55 PM
[No subject] - by yuku - 04-23-2004, 06:00 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-23-2004, 06:09 PM
[No subject] - by yuku - 04-23-2004, 06:12 PM
[No subject] - by yuku - 04-23-2004, 06:34 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-23-2004, 06:38 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-23-2004, 07:00 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-23-2004, 07:04 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-23-2004, 07:40 PM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-23-2004, 08:40 PM
[No subject] - by The Thadman - 04-24-2004, 02:21 AM
[No subject] - by Paul Younan - 04-25-2004, 06:17 PM
[No subject] - by byrnesey - 08-07-2004, 12:15 AM
Re: Juckel's study - by Phil - 06-09-2011, 03:18 PM
Re: Juckel's study - by Paul Younan - 06-09-2011, 05:16 PM
Re: Juckel's study - by Thirdwoe - 06-10-2011, 06:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)