Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
book of Hebrews: better from Greek, or Aramaic?
#73
Old Testament: primarily Hebrew, a little Aramaic. New Testament: Aramaic, except for maybe 2 Peter, 2 John, 3 John, Jude. The NT in Aramaic has 'Allaha' i.e. God, and 'MrYa' i.e. Master YHWH. When the NT was translated into Greek, the MrYa became the generic kurius i.e. lord. Information was left on the translation floor. Fortunately the Assyrian Church of the East has faithfully and carefully transmitted the NT in Aramaic ever since they received the vast bulk of it (not 2 Peter, 2 John, 3 John, Jude, and Revelation). Some NTs translate from the original Aramaic:
translations without 'hell'? accurate translations?
https://tentmaker.org/forum/judgement-an...nslations/

Religious seminaries are reluctant to accept that the Greek manuscripts are translations from Aramaic. The study of Greek is big business, and certain people have built their careers around their knowledge of Greek. But the evidence of Aramaic being original is out there:
3rd post down: Mistranslations in Your NT Translated From Greek,
Which Was Translated From the Original Aramaic
https://tentmaker.org/forum/judgement-an...nslations/

(06-17-2019, 08:28 AM)Thirdwoe Wrote: David, is torahinkingdom.com your website, and if so, did you put that interlinear together that is featured at that site? If so, there is a glaring mistake at Hebrews 2:9 where the western Peshitto reading has been cut off from the end of the verse.

No, it's not mine.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: book of Hebrews: better from Greek, or Aramaic? - by DavidFord - 06-23-2019, 02:44 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)