Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
agapao and phileo - a split word? hopefully...
#17
Hoi,

There are in ARamaic, also two words for 'love' it's
habib and rahim. But agapao and phileo are no splitwords. It is just that Zorba, one time choose the one word, the other time the other for no good reason.

But, these are no important differences.

However, I do not agree that the Greek translation difference, means just some details, word choices.
For instance, it's ok to scourge or beat your children in name of love, but according to aramaic, 'take apart' for instruction.


Another issue is the divine source. A divine source, would not make Jesus visit a leeper in his house, while still calling him a 'leeper' In fact, he was a potter. Among other things, the Aramaic source, does not say that God made people deaf and blind for the truth. The Aramaic sais that people did it themselves. Quit an important thing, when we talk about the love of God, while God himself, CAUSED the Jews to be deaf and blind for the Messiah?

The most important thing, in doctrine is that the Aramaic text, shows us that Jeshua is YHWH (Mar-Yah)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
agapao and phileo - a split word? hopefully... - by drmlanc - 09-15-2003, 09:42 AM
. - by drmlanc - 09-15-2003, 11:04 AM
. - by drmlanc - 09-15-2003, 09:03 PM
. - by drmlanc - 09-15-2003, 10:40 PM
. - by drmlanc - 09-16-2003, 03:02 AM
Re: . - by Larry Kelsey - 09-16-2003, 04:17 AM
. - by drmlanc - 09-16-2003, 07:58 AM
. - by drmlanc - 09-17-2003, 07:43 AM
Re: . - by Paul Younan - 09-17-2003, 01:18 PM
. - by drmlanc - 09-17-2003, 08:48 PM
Re: . - by Paul Younan - 09-17-2003, 08:57 PM
. - by drmlanc - 09-17-2003, 09:10 PM
Re: . - by Paul Younan - 09-17-2003, 11:31 PM
. - by drmlanc - 09-18-2003, 10:01 AM
Re: . - by Larry Kelsey - 09-19-2003, 04:49 AM
Re: agapao and phileo - a split word? hopefully... - by distazo - 12-07-2009, 03:48 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: