11-25-2013, 02:18 AM
You are contradicting history altogether, Caruso.
The idea that Syriac didn't exist in first century AD doesn't make any sense.
Book "Targum and Testament Revisited: Aramaic Paraphrases of the Hebrew Bible" by Martin McNamara, Page 96 - In Septuagint manuscripts (Manuscripts- Aleph, A, B, and C), there is an epilogue in Book of Job which is introduced with the words: "houtos hermeneutai ek tes syriakes bibliou."
Translation - "this was translated from the Syriac book".
On the top of that, Jesus Christ was preaching to everyone who came to him - from Syria, Tyre & Sidon in Lebanon, Galilee, Judea, Idumea, Jordan, and beyond Jordan (Matthew 4:24-25, Luke 6:17, Mark 3:7-8).
Khabouris Manuscript is a 11th century copy of a manuscript that can be dated as early as 2nd century AD. Scholars copy the information for religious purposes and also preservation.
It is done in India all the time.
The idea that Syriac didn't exist in first century AD doesn't make any sense.
Book "Targum and Testament Revisited: Aramaic Paraphrases of the Hebrew Bible" by Martin McNamara, Page 96 - In Septuagint manuscripts (Manuscripts- Aleph, A, B, and C), there is an epilogue in Book of Job which is introduced with the words: "houtos hermeneutai ek tes syriakes bibliou."
Translation - "this was translated from the Syriac book".
On the top of that, Jesus Christ was preaching to everyone who came to him - from Syria, Tyre & Sidon in Lebanon, Galilee, Judea, Idumea, Jordan, and beyond Jordan (Matthew 4:24-25, Luke 6:17, Mark 3:7-8).
Khabouris Manuscript is a 11th century copy of a manuscript that can be dated as early as 2nd century AD. Scholars copy the information for religious purposes and also preservation.
It is done in India all the time.