Poll: The need for a free, public domain, and non-copyright English version of the Eastern Peshitta
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, get a group of volunteers who know Aramaic and will try to do this from scratch using the Aramaic manuscripts available. <Except the Khabouris - which is copyrighted>
7.69%
1 7.69%
Yes, get a group to instead revise the existing translations (Etheridge or Murdock) using the Eastern / ACoE manuscripts and also consulting Etheridge, Murdock, and Norton texts. <Not using the Khabouris though, because it is copyrighted. >
0%
0 0%
Yes, but rather assemble a group of volunteers to help update and complete the Paul Younan Interlinear.
23.08%
3 23.08%
Or...translate the Khabouris manuscript, if provided permission from the copyright holder(s).
23.08%
3 23.08%
No, rather request that the upcoming CoE translation fulfil the role of "free", "non-copyright" and "public domain" version of the Bible.
23.08%
3 23.08%
NO! There is NO need for another translation of the Bible to be out there!
7.69%
1 7.69%
No! Do it yourself! I won't partake in this.
7.69%
1 7.69%
I don't care.
7.69%
1 7.69%
Total 13 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's your opinion on this?
#26
distazo Wrote:I am just worried about the public confusion. Those 'variants' do not convince someone who does not believe, it is even misused by those who want to sow doubts.
It is not the righteousness of the Eastern Aramaic PeshittA that they use to sow doubt but the variances thereof within the Greek translations that are being used to sow doubt upon THE TESTIMONY OF YEHOSHUA.


distazo Wrote:It's a little like Paul said, that languages do not convince those who are outside and weak christians (I mean, not having a good fundament) are not helped by more translations.
Where are you going with this circular thought? Such people are not going to be helped with flawed translations either. You seem to be saying that the correct readings could not be understood by the worldly people, so just keep the flawed translations as it is good enough to win them over to the truth. If they are not going to understand the purest form of The Word then what does it matter as the flawed form will do them no better. Yet The Purer form would help those whom are seeking truths, while the flawed translation only serve to hinder them. If you think to many translations are a problem, then after purer translations are made, burn off the excess from the faulty side, not by standing in the way of better translation being made.

Yes many have come to know YHWH and His only begotten Son through a mirid of perverted translations but how much more through the purest Word of YHWH?

And trying to use such excuses as there are already enough Eastern Aramaic translations out there is based upon a lie, as most of them are truly Western PeshittO translation, in which were renderings of the Eastern PeshittA to conform it unto the mistakes and perversions within the Greek translations of the Eastern PeshittA (or possibly from the Mother Text in which the Eastern PeshittA was copied) to start with. Why hold onto many confusing translations while limiting ones of a PURER Nature???

But for those whom would prefer to study and preach/teach from either the Greek families or even from the Western Aramaic PeshittO families by all means they should do as they wish. But let them be cursed (of themselves) if they think they can stop the Eastern PeshittA from coming into the full light of day.

Who are they to say that just because they are satisfied with a translation that has half truths and pure perversions within them gives them the right to speak out again the PUREST FORM OF THE TESTIMONY OF YEHOSHUA (a.k.a. - The Eastern Aramaic PeshittA)!!!

If people prefer a faithful translation of the Eastern PeshittA they have a right to pursue this means to no end. Ask yourselves just what spirit would want to perpetuate the perversion over the purest form possible? Would it not be that of HaSawtawn (the adversarial spirit against the WORD Of YHWH)?

So I say again (not because I think we should, but rather to those whom want to put a limit upon The TESTIMONY OF YEHOSHUA), as if making truer translations of THE TESTIMONY OF YEHOSHUA could add any confusion brought on by the mirid of faulty and perversed translations out there already, then simply burn of the chaff (i.e. - the worst of the translations out there today) until there is room enough in their minds eye for the most faithful translations, instead of trying to burn other's hopes and dreams of a Purer translation from the PUREST TEXTs (a.k.a. - The Eastern Aramaic PeshittA) of The TESTIMONY OF YEHOSHUA!!!

I could tell you of more than one tragic story rout from the believes based upon faulty translation and how faithful translations from the Eastern Aramaic PeshittA would squash such ignorance, but most are long and it should be suffice to say there are more said stories based on trusting faulty translations than there are faulty translation.

LONG LIVE THE TESTIMONY OF YEHOSHUA THROUGH ITS FAITHFUL EASTERN ARAMAIC PESHITTA and as many truthful translations thereof, PERIOD!!! !!!

{Psalm 1:1}
Blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked or stand in the way of sinners or sit in the seat of mockers. [Nor tries to stop those seeking the pure WORDS of truth within the Eastern Aramaic PeshittA]
(New International Version)

Again stick with what ever translation(s) you wish just do not stand between the PUREST FORM OF THE TESTIMONY OF YEHOSHUA coming forth unto a dying world, lest yeah find yourself on the side of The Adversary to YHWH's WORD.

From one Eastern Aramaic PeshittA onliest:
May,
YHWH bless thee and keep thee;
YHWH cause His face to shine on thee, and be gracious to thee;
YHWH lift up His face to thee, and give thee shalom.

Your brother in Yehoshuah The Anointed One.

will
Reply


Messages In This Thread
What's your opinion on this? - by DrawCloser - 01-06-2013, 04:38 PM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by DrawCloser - 01-06-2013, 09:39 PM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by SteveCaruso - 01-07-2013, 02:33 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by Thirdwoe - 01-09-2013, 05:19 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by distazo - 01-09-2013, 01:14 PM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by Burning one - 01-10-2013, 02:15 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by Thirdwoe - 01-10-2013, 07:53 PM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by distazo - 01-11-2013, 11:52 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by The Texas RAT - 01-12-2013, 07:30 PM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by distazo - 01-12-2013, 08:58 PM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by distazo - 01-13-2013, 08:06 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by Burning one - 01-14-2013, 02:53 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by DrawCloser - 01-14-2013, 03:03 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by Burning one - 01-14-2013, 05:16 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by distazo - 01-14-2013, 08:21 AM
Re: What's your opinion on this? - by distazo - 01-14-2013, 03:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)