12-17-2012, 02:33 PM
Shlama all,
Here is a rough draft of a list I have come up with pointing out several translation and typographical errors, as well as a few of my own suggestions. There's a couple times where I talk about theology in the footnotes, but I tried not to get into this too much and rather just focus on the text. I go into the footnotes only if it either relates directly to the text or it's something that I can't ignore (and I can ignore a fair amount given that my focus here is not on the theology of the footnotes).
EDIT: New link,
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/117246920/Aent-Errors">http://www.scribd.com/doc/117246920/Aent-Errors</a><!-- m -->
I'll keep using the AENT for a bit yet (some of the new footntoes are actually pretty good and edifying) so I may add to the list here and there, as well as give a complete review of the 5th edition volume in a bit, but until then, enjoy the list and let me know what you guys think.
Here is a rough draft of a list I have come up with pointing out several translation and typographical errors, as well as a few of my own suggestions. There's a couple times where I talk about theology in the footnotes, but I tried not to get into this too much and rather just focus on the text. I go into the footnotes only if it either relates directly to the text or it's something that I can't ignore (and I can ignore a fair amount given that my focus here is not on the theology of the footnotes).
EDIT: New link,
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/117246920/Aent-Errors">http://www.scribd.com/doc/117246920/Aent-Errors</a><!-- m -->
I'll keep using the AENT for a bit yet (some of the new footntoes are actually pretty good and edifying) so I may add to the list here and there, as well as give a complete review of the 5th edition volume in a bit, but until then, enjoy the list and let me know what you guys think.