Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Remarks in the Khabouris manuscript margin
#42
Quote:the Old Syriac, the Harklean, the Philoxenan, the Christian Palestinian Aramaic New Testament

None of the above are The Aramaic New Testament, 'i.e. The Peshitta, as has always been used by The Church of the East. They never used those versions, because the text found in them wasn't given to them by the Apostles. They are from later hands, and other origins. We know what they are, and from what sources the are derived from.

Quote:Charley, I will not discuss this further in this thread,

Really... <!-- sSmile --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /><!-- sSmile -->

Discuss this, Steve. Is The Khabouris Codex The Aramaic New Testament? If you don't think so, what do you say it is then?

.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Remarks in the Khabouris manuscript margin - by Thirdwoe - 10-01-2014, 06:25 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)