10-30-2012, 04:24 AM
:
Good catch Bro. But I don't think Etheridge and Murdoch translated from the same Aramaic source/sources, so it may be that Etheridge's Aramaic source didn't have that part of the verse in Mark, and had Alaha, rather than MarYa in Acts 13:49. If not, he slipped up twice pretty bad there...and if his Aramaic text really did read that way, then the scribe slipped up pretty bad.
Dylan has both Murdoch and Etheridges versions in hard copy, so maybe see if they used the same Aramaic source/sources. Please Dylan? <!-- s:bigups: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/bigups.gif" alt=":bigups:" title="Big Ups" /><!-- s:bigups: -->
Shlama,
Chuck
Good catch Bro. But I don't think Etheridge and Murdoch translated from the same Aramaic source/sources, so it may be that Etheridge's Aramaic source didn't have that part of the verse in Mark, and had Alaha, rather than MarYa in Acts 13:49. If not, he slipped up twice pretty bad there...and if his Aramaic text really did read that way, then the scribe slipped up pretty bad.
Dylan has both Murdoch and Etheridges versions in hard copy, so maybe see if they used the same Aramaic source/sources. Please Dylan? <!-- s:bigups: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/bigups.gif" alt=":bigups:" title="Big Ups" /><!-- s:bigups: -->
Shlama,
Chuck