Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 Th. 4:17 vs. 1 Co. 15:52
#2
Shlama Brian,

welcome and i pray you find this a haven of hope and truth in M'sheekha!!

as for your question, the two terms are unrelated - NETHKHALAPH (change / transform) and NETHKH'TAPH (take away). they DO appear similar, as the Lamadh and the Tet are structurally similar, so it would be an easy mistake to make.

it would appear that even the ancient translators made mistakes of this degree - check out Acts 13:8, where the Greek has the name ELYMAS in some manuscripts, and ETOIMAS in others. the Peshitta has only ELUMAS, with a Lamadh. but an easy misreading of the Lamadh as a Tet would yield the Greek variant ETOIMAS. not so easy to come by in the Greek, but VERY EASY to happen from the Aramaic!


Chayim b'Moshiach,
Jeremy
Reply


Messages In This Thread
1 Th. 4:17 vs. 1 Co. 15:52 - by bknight - 09-17-2012, 02:28 PM
Re: 1 Th. 4:17 vs. 1 Co. 15:52 - by Burning one - 09-17-2012, 03:23 PM
Re: 1 Th. 4:17 vs. 1 Co. 15:52 - by Thirdwoe - 09-17-2012, 06:36 PM
Re: 1 Th. 4:17 vs. 1 Co. 15:52 - by bknight - 09-19-2012, 11:28 AM
Re: 1 Th. 4:17 vs. 1 Co. 15:52 - by angileena - 10-05-2012, 06:07 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)