09-29-2011, 04:00 PM
Shlama,
i've personally got a major prob with the teaching that the "Trinity" died on the cross! whoa! where is that coming from? do you truly teach that, Dave?
personally, i would hold to the Eastern Peshitta reading simply because, contextually, it fits so much better than the idea of "Alaha" shedding His blood. does Spirit have flesh and bone and blood - or does humanity have flesh and bone and blood? contextually, Mesheekha makes the most sense as being original. as for the Corinthians ref. to body and blood of MarYa, no big deal there because Acts tells us that Yeshua was made BOTH MarYa and Mesheekha, so the title fits seamlessly. it is contextually in Acts 20:28 that Eastern Peshitta's reading fits better than the Peshitto's reading that Dave promotes.
as it stands, i'd like to share some textual evidence for the Eastern reading outside of the Syriac. i can't recall if all these have been mentioned before in this thread, but the apparatus i have access to gives these other considerations that read variously:
KURIOU IESOU (Lord Yeshua)
CHRISTOU (Christ)
IESOU CHRISTOU (Yeshua Christ)
where you can find them:
Ambrosiaster (Pseudo-Ambrose) - in Latin
Theodoret 1/2
Theophylact a
It(m)
i find it of note that Theodoret, who was OPPOSED to the "Nestorian" view, gave the reading of CHRISTOU.
interesting, huh?
Chayim b'Moshiach,
Jeremy
i've personally got a major prob with the teaching that the "Trinity" died on the cross! whoa! where is that coming from? do you truly teach that, Dave?
personally, i would hold to the Eastern Peshitta reading simply because, contextually, it fits so much better than the idea of "Alaha" shedding His blood. does Spirit have flesh and bone and blood - or does humanity have flesh and bone and blood? contextually, Mesheekha makes the most sense as being original. as for the Corinthians ref. to body and blood of MarYa, no big deal there because Acts tells us that Yeshua was made BOTH MarYa and Mesheekha, so the title fits seamlessly. it is contextually in Acts 20:28 that Eastern Peshitta's reading fits better than the Peshitto's reading that Dave promotes.
as it stands, i'd like to share some textual evidence for the Eastern reading outside of the Syriac. i can't recall if all these have been mentioned before in this thread, but the apparatus i have access to gives these other considerations that read variously:
KURIOU IESOU (Lord Yeshua)
CHRISTOU (Christ)
IESOU CHRISTOU (Yeshua Christ)
where you can find them:
Ambrosiaster (Pseudo-Ambrose) - in Latin
Theodoret 1/2
Theophylact a
It(m)
i find it of note that Theodoret, who was OPPOSED to the "Nestorian" view, gave the reading of CHRISTOU.
interesting, huh?
Chayim b'Moshiach,
Jeremy