01-31-2011, 12:49 PM
justalex Wrote:Distazo,<!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href="http://www.peshitta.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&p=16056#p16055">viewtopic.php?f=17&p=16056#p16055</a><!-- l -->
What do you do with the ONE passage I gave you??? Luqa 2:52 remember... No one has addressed that one passage as of yet, all that has been done is to try to justify the "why" of your belief system... And as I said to Stephen, if you cannot answerthat question, it's really not a problem because you aren't alone...
About believe systems; They are called with a reason. So is your 'system'.
justalex Wrote:If perhaps you could find where I said YAHUshuah was "merely a prophet" you would again have a valid point... however YOU CANNOT find such as I have NEVER made such a statememt, so again, the question is why not just answer the question??? How could The Son gain favour with ELOHIYM if He is ELOHIYM???
This shows you have not read any of my replies.
All I wrote was for nothing?
Luqa did not write that Yeshu was the Eternal God himself. I explained to you that Yeshu in fact also is God (John 1:1, 18) but when Luqa wrote that verse, he wrote about the heavenly God and addresses him as 'Alaha'.
Even Stefanos makes this point Acts 7:53:
He sees the BarNasha standing WITH Alaha.
He saw Alaha AND the son.
However, many occasions from John and Paul explain that Yeshu ALSO was God. God is not a name it is a title.
The name YHWH however, higher than any other name, is given to Yeshu (PHillipians 2:9). The name is not just 'LORD' which is not a name.
When I make this point, I am accused of being Arian, well and this makes dogmatism really laughable. What ever you all guys have in store for believe systems; none of you can prove and claim truth.
NEITHER do you and I. Alex.