Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
About Luke 16:19-31 II century interpolation
#16
Innoire Wrote:
Quote:But the peshitta has 22 books but the "Evangelion Da-Mephareshe" only has 4 books. How can you get 22 books out of 4?

I don't discuss the "primacy". I want more information about Evanghelion Da-Mepharese, pls.


Here is some information about it.
<!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href="http://www.peshitta.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=416">viewtopic.php?f=23&t=416</a><!-- l -->
Reply
#17
Thx.
Now, I have a question.
The so called Curetonian Gospel is the Evangelion Dampharshe?
Pls, somebody help me.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/Curetonian.htm">http://www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/Curetonian.htm</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#18
Innoire Wrote:Thx.
Now, I have a question.
The so called Curetonian Gospel is the Evangelion Dampharshe?
Pls, somebody help me.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/Curetonian.htm">http://www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/Curetonian.htm</a><!-- m -->

Yes it is part of the OS.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Syriac">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Syriac</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#19
judge Wrote:
Innoire Wrote:Thx.
Now, I have a question.
The so called Curetonian Gospel is the Evangelion Dampharshe?
Pls, somebody help me.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/Curetonian.htm">http://www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/Curetonian.htm</a><!-- m -->

Yes it is part of the OS. The OS is the Curetonian and the Sinaitic Palimpsest .
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Syriac">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Syriac</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#20
Thx. And Peshitta is oldest?
Reply
#21
Shlama John,

The Church of the East upholds the Peshitta as the original text.

Only according to textual and semantic analysis can the superiority of the Peshitta be demonstrated; I believe this is where the authority of Peshitta ought to be derived. And it has proven itself to be superior in a myriad of situations. People say it's from the 5th century, but that comes from latter copies of the same writings (of which the earliest have been lost or are hidden away in the Vatican). This story can, and I believe ought, to be seen as allegorical (a parable, as people like to say).
Reply
#22
Shlama Aaron,
Thx for comment.
I am interested in early texts variants and quotations from The Gospel of Luke, from I-IV century.
Reply
#23
For example:

In Luke 23:43 the variant I say today to you, you will be with me in paradise supported only by unspaced dot in Codex Vaticanus and lack of punctuation in earlier Greek MSS.[4]

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curetonian_Gospels">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curetonian_Gospels</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#24
I searching in special after the texts variants and quotations from The Rich Man And Lazarus (Luke 16)
Reply
#25
According to the Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece, ed. 27 p. 214, 65, 66; The Text of the New Testament (Kurt Aland, Barbara Aland) p. 193

and

Novum Testamentum Graece, ed. 27 p. 214, 691; The Text of the New Testament (Kurt Aland, Barbara Aland) p. 109

Codex Bezae Cantabrigensis and Codex Curetonianus Syriacus say thai in Luke 16:19 our Lord Jesus told a "parable".

Why in this ancient texts that story is named a "parable"?
Reply
#26
I need some references, in connection with this, pls.:

"The second journey was also to Arabia, and this time dealt with those who believed the soul dies with the body and is resurrected with the body. A council was convened with Origen present, and those holding this view were converted.
A third mission, the place and time of which is unclear, found Origen conducting a council and questioning Bishop Heraclides on several matters, including the diversity and unity of Father and the Son, the two natures of the Son, adoptionism and the the immorality of the soul."

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/people/origen.htm">http://www.religionfacts.com/christiani ... origen.htm</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#27
From what town was this "Bishop Heraclides"? Thx a lot for eny help!
Reply
#28
Very interesting. Bishop Heraclides was also in Arabia. But, my helper do not know the town.
Reply
#29
The quotation of "Abraham s blossom" is foud in some ancient jewish Apocrypha, but never in the paralel Bible books.
You know what is an Apocrypha.
1.F. Preisigke, Sammelbuch Griechischer Urkunden aus Aegypten 2034:11
2.Apocalipse of Zepaniah 9:2
3.4. Maccabees 13:17
4.Rabh Adah Bar Ahavah said, by way' of prophecy, This day doth he sit in Abraham's bosom" Lightfoot p161
Reply
#30
Innoire Wrote:Thx. And Peshitta is oldest?
This depends both on whom you ask and what you mean by "oldest."
Many, including myself, would contend that the Peshitta is a translation. No one would say that the manuscripts of the Peshitta are the oldest, though there is a strong movement toward arguing that the text itself is the oldest.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)