05-03-2009, 07:12 PM
Shlama Akhi Dawid, and I see you are not addressing me in this way nor wishing me peace.
Please see the defintions I just provided. I gave the Merriam-Webster defintions of plagiarism in the link originally provided and turned every aspect of that defintion back, i.e. shown that they don't apply to AENT. A plagiarized work can be considered an infringement of copyright. The two ideas a frequently interchanged in public discourse, so to allege one is to imply the other. I refuse to stand on semantic ceremony. Plus it doesn't seem to have occurred to you that Bauscher is suggesting the more serious allegation by applying the broader term and hoping people will think A = B.
But beyond this, AENT is NOT plagiarized, and I will continue to say so that by the legal, copyright and fair use provisions NEITHER HAS HAPPENED.
Please get your facts right.
Please see the defintions I just provided. I gave the Merriam-Webster defintions of plagiarism in the link originally provided and turned every aspect of that defintion back, i.e. shown that they don't apply to AENT. A plagiarized work can be considered an infringement of copyright. The two ideas a frequently interchanged in public discourse, so to allege one is to imply the other. I refuse to stand on semantic ceremony. Plus it doesn't seem to have occurred to you that Bauscher is suggesting the more serious allegation by applying the broader term and hoping people will think A = B.
But beyond this, AENT is NOT plagiarized, and I will continue to say so that by the legal, copyright and fair use provisions NEITHER HAS HAPPENED.
Please get your facts right.
Shlama w'burkate
Andrew Gabriel Roth
Andrew Gabriel Roth