Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Aramaic Primicists Respond: Josephus and Aramaic Primacy
#8
Shlama Akhi Paul and Akhi Brantana,

I admit I wanted to hold my tongue once I saw this information, but more because of the time constraints that I am under for obvious reasons. But I think it is kind of ironic that this "professor" was attacking Raphael Lataster's book since that book currently using to great effect the "______ for Dummies Book" pattern, and that's really what teacher-man SHOULD try to read. I would have sent him some of my leftover of He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named's stuff but:

1) It will make him more ignorant, not less and
2) I already used up my supply of printed bathroom tissue for the week!

The whole thing about Aramaic NT books not having survived though was a real hoot. Oh BTW one of the really cool essays coming out with Mari-PEACE deals with the whole question of Josephus being a Nazarene.

Shlama w'burkate
Andrew Gabriel Roth
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Aramaic Primicists Respond: Josephus and Aramaic Primacy - by Andrew Gabriel Roth - 04-29-2008, 04:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)