Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Aramaic Primicists Respond: Josephus and Aramaic Primacy
#3
Khati Brantana and Akh Abudar,

This is a hilarious post, mostly a re-hash of nonsense we've heard and read over the years.

Brantana - is there any way to get a hold of this fellow and invite him to a 1-on-1 debate with me, broadcast live right here on the website? I'll make sure to record it as well, so we can replay it over and over again whenever we need a good laugh. I would love the opportunity.....let's see how much he REALLY knows.

+Shamasha Paul

PS - Akhay, get a load of his statement:
Quote:"I have not seen any indications that Aramaic was a literary language at that time."

Akhi Andrew, do you have a spare set of grade school-level encyclopedias to donate to this unfortunate soul? Not a literary language? Does this man realize that Aramaic was a literary language 1,000 years before Meshikha was born?

While you're chuckling at that, get a load of this one:

Quote:....since it appears that the original teachings of Jesus were in Aramaic.

Gee....Yeah, you really think, genius?

You're a master of the obvious, Mr. Jenkins, aren't you?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Aramaic Primicists Respond: Josephus and Aramaic Primacy - by Paul Younan - 04-29-2008, 03:35 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)