Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Matthew 28:19
#91
So much insanity; so little time.

I will quote one verse from Colossians 3 used by Dave Blah Blah's argument:
"Whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus. .." (Colossians 3:17).

This, according to him, is supposed to refute Matthew 28:19. If I understand his argument, to baptize in the Name of The Lord Jesus means to say:"I baptize you in the name of the Lord Jesus".
This supposedly means Matthew 28:19 cannot be true, because the apostles baptized in the Name of Jesus Christ, according to Acts 2:38 and other verses in Acts.

If "in the name" means to speak the name, then Colossians 3:17 says we should tie our shoes while reciting the name of the Lord Jesus; we must blow our noses reciting the name of The Lord Jesus; we must recite it while chewing our food, reading a book, turning the page, drinking water, shaving, washing, brushing our teeth, and performing all bodily functions.
I would have to be reciting it while writing this and you would have to while reading it.

I think I make my point clear. The apostle Paul did not consult Dave Blah Blah before writing Colossians 3:17. That verse is used by Blah Blah to refute Matthew 28:19 and baptism in the Name of The Trinity.
As it stands in Dave's mind, it refutes everything ! There would be no time or energy
left to do anything but recite !

If the phrase,"In the Name", does not necessarily involve reciting these words as a verbal formula, then Acts does not contradict Matthew 28:19. It refers to the authority conferred to the apostles from God , Christ and The Holy Spirit. There is no division or disparity between Christ and His Father or The Holy Spirit.


Having fun,

Dave Bauscher
Get my NT translations, books & articles at :
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://aramaicnt.com">http://aramaicnt.com</a><!-- m --> and Lulu.com
I also have articles at BibleCodeDigest.com
Reply
#92
Dave, the Pee-Wee Herman "I know you are but what am I?" thing you have going on here is pretty lame, and quite immature.

What?,..If you don't get your way, you start calling a person names, then start taking things out of context just to cause trouble, what is next,...beating the floor while throwing a trantrum?

Quite the sore loser Dave.
Reply
#93
Dave Blah Blah Blah wrote,

Quote:Dave, the Pee-Wee Herman "I know you are but what am I?" thing you have going on here is pretty lame, and quite immature.

What?,..If you don't get your way, you start calling a person names, then start taking things out of context just to cause trouble, what is next,...beating the floor while throwing a trantrum?

Quite the sore loser Dave.

I agree completely, Dave. You are the Dave you write of. A perfect description.

Romans 2:1-3


Dave
Get my NT translations, books & articles at :
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://aramaicnt.com">http://aramaicnt.com</a><!-- m --> and Lulu.com
I also have articles at BibleCodeDigest.com
Reply
#94
Dave,

Your acting immature about this.

I'm sorry that scripture did not solidify your position, but there has to be a right and a wrong. Your position was based on conjecture and backpeddling, mine was based on scripture, of which you were unable to refute. Your syriac text was demonstrated to be just as wrong as the greek in this area, and a copy of it.

Again I'm sorry if that sort of truth hurts, but resorting to immature posts is not benefiting you the least bit.

You can continue on in this post if you like Dave, there is no further demonstration required from me.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)