Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
mistake in Murdock? (Mk 11:14)
#15
gbausc Wrote:Shlama Yuri,

You are still side stepping the question .
Translations are not inspired, as they all contain errors due to human falliblity and language barriers.
You know I am asking you to tell me which one you believe was the original New Testament.
If you cannot answer, I see no point in discussing NT texts and translation.

Dave

I don't think Yuri is sidestepping the question really. People have different ideas of what inspiration means. This is really a theological issue.

There are plenty of good people who can disagree about exactly what "inspired" means.
Here on this forum there are many different views of the books we call the NT, but if we concentrate on where we disagree philosophically then how can we meet? If we at least stick to common ground philosophically we can at least have a discussion.

Humbly...judge
Reply


Messages In This Thread
mistake in Murdock? (Mk 11:14) - by yuku - 09-27-2004, 08:54 PM
Murdock's mistake ? - by gbausc - 09-28-2004, 10:04 PM
Re: Murdock's mistake ? - by yuku - 09-29-2004, 03:59 PM
Redactions vs. The Truth - by gbausc - 09-30-2004, 07:37 PM
Re: Redactions vs. The Truth - by yuku - 10-01-2004, 10:18 PM
NT inspired ? - by gbausc - 10-02-2004, 10:17 AM
Re: NT inspired ? - by yuku - 10-02-2004, 02:54 PM
[No subject] - by gbausc - 10-02-2004, 06:32 PM
[No subject] - by yuku - 10-03-2004, 01:28 PM
[No subject] - by gbausc - 10-03-2004, 05:18 PM
[No subject] - by yuku - 10-08-2004, 01:12 PM
Evolution of texts - by gbausc - 10-09-2004, 09:12 PM
[No subject] - by judge - 10-11-2004, 12:06 AM
Disagree ? - by gbausc - 10-11-2004, 08:05 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)