Logic

[gbausc]

Shlama Se7en,

Reason is a human invention as a result of the evolution of our intelligence so we can arbitrarily assign whatever reason each of us needs to get us through the day or life for that matter.

Why should anyone believe your reasonings ? Why and how could we trust the product of evolution- a process of random molecular events which supposedly produced a human brain. How could we ever trust any conclusion any of us might reach if all is a product of chance ?
Do not say that God is behind it all. Evolutionists cannot have it both ways. Evolutionary theory is driven by an anti-God sentiment and spirit. Its premise is that God is unnecessary to explain the universe.It also ,of course, negates taking The Bible's history of creation literally and thereby discounts it as a serious witness to the origins of any species of plant, animal, humankind or thing.

All of that is done without a scintilla of evidence that hydrogen gas turns itself into stars, planets, oceans, land, tomatoes , trees , mountains and humans.

Biological evolution , simply put (which evolutionists are loathe to do), is that hydrogen gas evolved into a planet with oceans which somehow developed amino acids, which somehow, after billions of years, combined to produce a living cell of pond scum; that pond scum reproduced and multiplied and eventually evolved and improved itself into fish,frogs,crocodiles,dinosuars,horses,chimpanzees,... and Jesus Christ Himself.

One solitary scum.

And this has been Christened as "SCIENCE".
It is one of the most earnest religions I know. Its adherents exercize more faith in its tenets than most Christians do in the tenets of Jesus.
Such faith is obviously blind; it is a desperate attempt to dethrone God and usurp Him with a cloud of gas, the father of all, now worshipped as "Science".
Talk about hot air !

Of course, Science textbooks change every year. Compare a Science textbook from 1900 to one printed this year, then compare one from 1800, and tell me that in the year 2500, we will still read and hold the same theories proposed today. The one thing science documents is constant change in science.

Nothing wrong with that; but lets not confuse science with "The Truth". He whose name is "The Truth" does not change, neither does His word. The book of Genesis today is the same as the book Jesus quoted 2000 years ago :

Mr 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.Mr 10:6 (BYZ) apo de archv ktisewv arsen kai yhlu epoihsen autouv o yeov
Mr 10:6 (MUR) But, from the beginning, God made them a male and a female.
[font=Estrangelo (V1.1)]0hl0 Nwn0 db9 0tbqnw 0rkd Nyd ty$rb [/font]Nm Mr 10:6 (PESHITTA)
Mt. 19:4 (AV) And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
4 (BYZ) o de apokriyeiv eipen autoiv ouk anegnwte oti o poihsav ap archv arsen kai yhlu epoihsen autouv
4 (MUR) And he answered and said to them: Have ye not read, that he who made them at the beginning, made them a male and a female?
[font=Estrangelo (V1.1)]Nwn0 db9 0tbqnw 0rkd ty$rb Nm db9d whd Nwtyrq 0l Nwhl rm0w 0n9 Nyd wh[/font] 4 (PESHITTA)

Mt 19:5 (AV) And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
5 (BYZ) kai eipen eneken toutou kataleiqei anyrwpov ton patera autou kai thn mhtera kai proskollhyhsetai th gunaiki autou kai esontai oi duo eiv sarka mian
5 (MUR) And he said: For this reason, a man shall leave his father and his mother, and adhere to his wife; and they two shall be one flesh.
[font=Estrangelo (V1.1)]rsb dx Nwhyrt Nwwhnw httn0 Pqnw hm0lw yhwb0l 0rbg qwb$n 0nh l+m rm0w [/font]5 (PESHITTA)

We have Genesis Dead Sea scrolls 2000 years old. They read the same as what Jesus read, according to the NT Aramaic and Greek texts of Matthew and Mark quoted above.

First of all, Jesus accepted the accuracy of Genesis and quoted it as authoritative truth about the creation of man.
Secondly, Jesus said "God made them male and female from the beginning", meaning man was created at the beginning of creation.

"The beginning" refers to the six days of creation, as related in Genesis. Whether the first or the sixth day (man created on the 6th), both are referred to as "the beginning". How could that be, if creation was already 14 billion years old when man was created, as evolution teaches ?
If "the beginning" had more than one general sense than that used in Genesis 1:1 , Jesus would have elucidated it. He assumes the existence of man "from the beginning" elsewhere as well :
Mt 19:8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
Mt 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Mr 13:19 For in those days shall be affliction, such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither shall be.


Jesus' quotes from Genesis here carry more weight for me than all the Evolution textbooks ever written and Darwin's Origin of Species combined.

How about you ?


Shlama,

Dave