02-04-2004, 12:50 AM
I'm not discussing theology. I'm stating the sentence structure. It denotes 2 separate individuals in relation to the former post of yesterday. I'm looking for the title of Lord GOD being applied to Jesus, so far I'm not finding it.
The post from MG just happens to be another one where GOD and Jesus are mentioned together so I want to see if the title is actually applied someplace in the new testament scripture.
So far it is not. I don't think it will, since it would bring that particular book into question within the peshitta canon against all other accepted books.
You have no worries from me on the theology interest chris, nor would you need to "attempt" to assert yourself. My interest is in the translation, and the correct title applied without additional word usage as victor did to his translation. I'm also comparing Murdocks and Lamsa's translation along side to see what they came up with. So far they agree together.
You have no worries.
The post from MG just happens to be another one where GOD and Jesus are mentioned together so I want to see if the title is actually applied someplace in the new testament scripture.
So far it is not. I don't think it will, since it would bring that particular book into question within the peshitta canon against all other accepted books.
You have no worries from me on the theology interest chris, nor would you need to "attempt" to assert yourself. My interest is in the translation, and the correct title applied without additional word usage as victor did to his translation. I'm also comparing Murdocks and Lamsa's translation along side to see what they came up with. So far they agree together.
You have no worries.