03-17-2008, 08:45 PM
March 17, 2008
Dear Dave,
Your supposition that the alphabetical letters in the Peshitta are perfectly randomly distributed is obviously wrong. Therefore, all of your calculated Z values are meaningless. In addition, the distribution of your observations is not surprising, as I have shown.
The smaller fractional samples that you analyzed for each ???divine name??? would be expected to have greater variability than the total sample, and then those Z values are also meaningless.
You are obviously a skilled linguist and translator. Your Bible Code theories will tend to detract from the more important issue of Aramaic/Peshitta primacy because knowledgeable people will view them as goofy. Please stop marring your excellent translations with references to these irrelevant ???Bible Code??? theories.
Sincerely,
Otto
Dear Dave,
Your supposition that the alphabetical letters in the Peshitta are perfectly randomly distributed is obviously wrong. Therefore, all of your calculated Z values are meaningless. In addition, the distribution of your observations is not surprising, as I have shown.
The smaller fractional samples that you analyzed for each ???divine name??? would be expected to have greater variability than the total sample, and then those Z values are also meaningless.
You are obviously a skilled linguist and translator. Your Bible Code theories will tend to detract from the more important issue of Aramaic/Peshitta primacy because knowledgeable people will view them as goofy. Please stop marring your excellent translations with references to these irrelevant ???Bible Code??? theories.
Sincerely,
Otto