Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Romans" or "soldiers" in Act 23:10, 23, 31
#3
"Isn't it awkward and redundant to read "Romans" in those passages"
Not that I know of.
'Romans' there means 'soldiers.'  There's no redundancy in those 3 passages.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: "Romans" or "soldiers" in Act 23:10, 23, 31 - by DavidFord - 06-10-2020, 11:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)