Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Romans" or "soldiers" in Act 23:10, 23, 31
#2
(05-15-2020, 08:58 PM)Thomas Wrote: Isn't it awkward and redundant to read "Romans" in those passages, since everybody knows that the soldiers involved were Romans ?!?

Thomas --

No, IMHO, it is not awkward and redundant.   Acts is Radioactive.  I personally believe the subject matter of Acts is completely different from what is generally thought but I'm a Minority of One on this one.

"Romans" makes sense but you must ask a different Set of Questions to see why.

"I realize that sounds vague..."

Best,

CW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: "Romans" or "soldiers" in Act 23:10, 23, 31 - by Charles Wilson - 06-02-2020, 04:13 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)