Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mark 16: 9- 20
#15
Chuck,

Thanks so much for that. I really didn't know that there was that degree of dissonance between these two manuscripts. Really, that bad. This should be exposed to the light some more.

As to your question, I lean more (and now alot more ) to the Byzantine textual tradition. And I should look into this more.

Take care and Jehovah give more grace to us to serve Him better.

Kindly,

Mike
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Bram - 05-10-2013, 09:20 AM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Thirdwoe - 05-10-2013, 06:46 PM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by IPOstapyuk - 05-10-2013, 10:13 PM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Bram - 05-11-2013, 04:30 AM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by IPOstapyuk - 05-11-2013, 04:40 AM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Bram - 05-11-2013, 05:55 AM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Thirdwoe - 05-11-2013, 07:58 AM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by IPOstapyuk - 05-11-2013, 03:13 PM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Thirdwoe - 05-11-2013, 07:09 PM
Matthew 28:19 - by IPOstapyuk - 05-11-2013, 09:53 PM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Bram - 05-12-2013, 05:10 AM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Mike Kar - 05-13-2013, 07:27 PM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Mike Kar - 05-13-2013, 08:08 PM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Thirdwoe - 05-14-2013, 02:53 AM
Re: Mark 16: 9- 20 - by Mike Kar - 05-14-2013, 03:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)