Confusion on historical information...

[judge]

And is the West twisting infomration about the Aramaic NT?

If "the west" admits that the eastern chritians had an aramaic version of not just the gospels but many epistles, at an early date, then it means people will start asking "how early?"
If the peshitta is early then it becomes reasonable to ask which came first the greek or the Aramaic.
Hardly anyone in the west studies aramaic, millions study NT greek. All the NT experts are experts in NT greek. Are they likely to be inclined to admit they have spent years studying the wrong language?