06-14-2012, 06:53 PM
Greetings. <!-- s:whaasup: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/whaasup.gif" alt=":whaasup:" title="Whaasup" /><!-- s:whaasup: -->
ok, here is my first step:
Byzantine text type, including Majority text and critical editions of TR (Erasmus, Elizer, Stephanus, Schrinver, etc.) read "in the prophets".
Eclectic text (WH, NA, UBS), and then Peshitto and Peshitta read "Isaiah the prophet".
Any speculation why this discrepancy is in the aramaic Mark 1:2? <!-- s:eh: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/eh.gif" alt=":eh:" title="Eh" /><!-- s:eh: --> <!-- s
--><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/huh.gif" alt="" title="Huh" /><!-- s --> <!-- s:dontgetit: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/dontgetit.gif" alt=":dontgetit:" title="Dont Get It" /><!-- s:dontgetit: -->
Could Peshitta be derived from the same proto-source as the Critical text?
ok, here is my first step:
Byzantine text type, including Majority text and critical editions of TR (Erasmus, Elizer, Stephanus, Schrinver, etc.) read "in the prophets".
Eclectic text (WH, NA, UBS), and then Peshitto and Peshitta read "Isaiah the prophet".
Any speculation why this discrepancy is in the aramaic Mark 1:2? <!-- s:eh: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/eh.gif" alt=":eh:" title="Eh" /><!-- s:eh: --> <!-- s
--><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/huh.gif" alt="" title="Huh" /><!-- s --> <!-- s:dontgetit: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/dontgetit.gif" alt=":dontgetit:" title="Dont Get It" /><!-- s:dontgetit: -->Could Peshitta be derived from the same proto-source as the Critical text?