Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Luqa 2:52
#16
Jerry Wrote:
justalex Wrote:Well, I'm not really concerned with whether or not you agree with the rendering of YAHUshuah any more than I concern myself with the added "h" to the Aramaic "marya"... that is really irrelevant to the question posed...

And in your reply you didn't answer the question of "how" YAHUshuah "gained favour with ELOHIYM and man" if He is ELOHIYM/YHWH or your in the Aramaic primacist rendering marya(h)???

Thanks

justalex
You are right in that "marya" vs "maryah" would be an irrelevant and insignificant variance of transliteration, if that was ever a topic to begin with. YAHUshuah on the other hand, is relevant in that it appears to be a purposeful fabrication of man without biblical support; far beyond a subtle variance in styles of transliteration. And for your information, I have never claimed to be an Aramaic primacist, or non-primacist; nor have I ever advocated for the various assertions being made relative to Mar-Yah, if that was a point you were trying to make.

Regarding Luke 2:52, if you had understood my reply, you would know that I did not interpret the verse as being "gaining favour with God and man", but instead as "gaining ... in grace or graciousness ... towards God and man". In other words, an action of Yeshua towards God and man, and not God and man towards Yeshua. I might be wrong in that interpretation, but that was my reply.

Best regards.

Excuse me if I ignore the entire first paragraph as irrelevant to the topic and your opinion on such is just as irrelevant...

Your second paragraph, your "reply"... still does not answer the topic question as even if it is YAHUshuah gaining favour "towards" vs "with" G-d and man" it would still show that He (YAHUshuah" is not YHWH or in your case marya(h) or the teutonic germanic "gutt" if that be your particular vice...

Thanks for your response however it really doesn't address the question at all...

ShEMA YISRAEL YHWH ELOHEYNU YHWH | EChAD

justalex
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-26-2011, 12:36 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 01-26-2011, 04:00 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Aaron S - 01-26-2011, 05:51 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-27-2011, 12:32 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-27-2011, 12:36 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 01-27-2011, 05:06 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Jerry - 01-27-2011, 05:51 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 01-27-2011, 10:50 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-28-2011, 12:36 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-28-2011, 12:42 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-28-2011, 12:44 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-28-2011, 12:54 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Jerry - 01-28-2011, 01:44 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by sean - 01-28-2011, 04:55 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 01-28-2011, 06:42 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-29-2011, 10:54 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-29-2011, 11:07 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-29-2011, 11:25 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Stephen Silver - 01-30-2011, 11:46 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-30-2011, 05:20 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-30-2011, 05:33 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Stephen Silver - 01-30-2011, 09:32 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-31-2011, 04:39 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-31-2011, 04:43 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Stephen Silver - 01-31-2011, 05:17 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 01-31-2011, 11:14 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 01-31-2011, 11:32 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by justalex - 01-31-2011, 11:55 AM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 01-31-2011, 12:49 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Stephen Silver - 01-31-2011, 05:44 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by distazo - 02-01-2011, 01:24 PM
Re: Luqa 2:52 - by Stephen Silver - 02-02-2011, 02:27 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)