12-01-2010, 07:40 AM
This site is arguing about that at some point:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.homosexualeunuchsandthebible.com/id8.html">http://www.homosexualeunuchsandthebible.com/id8.html</a><!-- m -->
I thought that there are no original (aramaic) writings of Revelation. Mentioned site tries to prove that Crawford MS contains Revelation that is NOT translation from Greek. Could you please tell me is that site author correct?
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.homosexualeunuchsandthebible.com/id8.html">http://www.homosexualeunuchsandthebible.com/id8.html</a><!-- m -->
I thought that there are no original (aramaic) writings of Revelation. Mentioned site tries to prove that Crawford MS contains Revelation that is NOT translation from Greek. Could you please tell me is that site author correct?