05-23-2010, 06:44 PM
[font="Estrangelo (V1.1)"]Yhwndqwpb 0dqwpd 0swmnw[/font]
and-[the]-laws of-[the]-commands in-his-commandments
Some have said the doubling up of the root [font="Estrangelo (V1.1)"]dqp[/font] back-to-back with [font="Estrangelo (V1.1)"]0swmn[/font] is attempting to reference the rules-upon-rules of the religious Jews.
In Luke 1:6, [font="Estrangelo (V1.1)"]Yhwndqwp[/font] is rendered his-commandments.
What does an pro-abolitionist interpretation say about the triple-compounding of law/command?
and-[the]-laws of-[the]-commands in-his-commandments
Some have said the doubling up of the root [font="Estrangelo (V1.1)"]dqp[/font] back-to-back with [font="Estrangelo (V1.1)"]0swmn[/font] is attempting to reference the rules-upon-rules of the religious Jews.
In Luke 1:6, [font="Estrangelo (V1.1)"]Yhwndqwp[/font] is rendered his-commandments.
What does an pro-abolitionist interpretation say about the triple-compounding of law/command?