08-27-2004, 09:51 PM
Dave wrote:
"We know the aramaic does correct many areas within the greek text. The only problem I'm seeing with the peshitta at the moment is the doctrinal issues it presents. Does it agree with mainstream Christianity and teaches correct doctrine or does it confuse and divide the church? As I see it, it has certain areas in the NT that agree with the "Jesus is GOD" heretics. This will show itself to me a major problem as this text is promoted over the greek."
Wow, WOW!
How can a man challenge the Peshitta text reliability?
Dave, for me the Peshitta solves the problems. Jesus is Jehovah as 1st Corinthians says. The 22 books Peshitta was faithfully copied for almost 2000 years, all manuscripts are identical. A tree is understood on account of its fruits. The Greek New Testament represents many versions, or as Paul Younan said many New Testaments. As scribes heavily were distorting the GNT then what fruits we have now?The results are evident!
WOW.
"We know the aramaic does correct many areas within the greek text. The only problem I'm seeing with the peshitta at the moment is the doctrinal issues it presents. Does it agree with mainstream Christianity and teaches correct doctrine or does it confuse and divide the church? As I see it, it has certain areas in the NT that agree with the "Jesus is GOD" heretics. This will show itself to me a major problem as this text is promoted over the greek."
Wow, WOW!
How can a man challenge the Peshitta text reliability?
Dave, for me the Peshitta solves the problems. Jesus is Jehovah as 1st Corinthians says. The 22 books Peshitta was faithfully copied for almost 2000 years, all manuscripts are identical. A tree is understood on account of its fruits. The Greek New Testament represents many versions, or as Paul Younan said many New Testaments. As scribes heavily were distorting the GNT then what fruits we have now?The results are evident!
WOW.