03-26-2014, 03:54 PM
You may continue on if you so desire, in your speculations, assumptions, conjectures, and guesses, and willing denial that the Aramaic is indeed the original form of the New Testament.
I told you in the beginning, that I am only interested in discussing the text itself, because that is the only way to come to real truth on the matter, as all else is speculation.
And have shown you that the word translated "commending" in the English versions, in the verse you chose, which you assumed was mistranslated in the Aramaic text, is certainly not, which I proved to you from the lectionaries and the dictionaries.
You like your own opinions much better than the truth of the matter, so I'll let you keep them if you like.
If you want to discuss another verse, where you think the Aramaic mistranslated a Greek word, then I am happy to look at it.
Also, I hold no ill will against you, nor harbor any spite in my heart for you, and forgive you for being rude and mocking in your tone, as it seems you can't help it. I ask God's mercy for your soul.
.
I told you in the beginning, that I am only interested in discussing the text itself, because that is the only way to come to real truth on the matter, as all else is speculation.
And have shown you that the word translated "commending" in the English versions, in the verse you chose, which you assumed was mistranslated in the Aramaic text, is certainly not, which I proved to you from the lectionaries and the dictionaries.
You like your own opinions much better than the truth of the matter, so I'll let you keep them if you like.
If you want to discuss another verse, where you think the Aramaic mistranslated a Greek word, then I am happy to look at it.
Also, I hold no ill will against you, nor harbor any spite in my heart for you, and forgive you for being rude and mocking in your tone, as it seems you can't help it. I ask God's mercy for your soul.
.