03-22-2014, 03:44 AM
No, Mr./Ms. Anonymous will remain so. All he/she is doing is rehashing the same old tired arguments we've seen on this forum for decades, while pretending to give us new revelation. The main reason I've left the posts up (besides the fact that they don't really break any forum rules), is to show everyone how truly shallow their "evidence" really is. "Thousands of scholars" - my foot. Bring a real one here so we can have fun with him/her. <!-- s
--><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smile.gif" alt="
" title="Smile" /><!-- s
-->
I'd like for Mr./Ms. Anonymous to explain some examples from the text itself, like the Janus Parallelism in James 3:18 that is only possible using the Aramaic language.
But, I have a feeling that the only language the "anonymous one" knows is English. So I don't expect a lesson in Greek here (let alone, Aramaic.)
+Shamasha
PS - as soon as you ask them to explain something like James 3:18, and how that could have been constructed in anything other than Aramaic, they quickly flee like cockroaches. You no longer hear the lame "but the Corinthians were ethnic Greeks" excuse. Because that's all they have.
As if Jews and Assyrians in Chicago (or Moscow, or Athens for that matter) don't speak Aramaic with each other today.



I'd like for Mr./Ms. Anonymous to explain some examples from the text itself, like the Janus Parallelism in James 3:18 that is only possible using the Aramaic language.
But, I have a feeling that the only language the "anonymous one" knows is English. So I don't expect a lesson in Greek here (let alone, Aramaic.)
+Shamasha
PS - as soon as you ask them to explain something like James 3:18, and how that could have been constructed in anything other than Aramaic, they quickly flee like cockroaches. You no longer hear the lame "but the Corinthians were ethnic Greeks" excuse. Because that's all they have.
As if Jews and Assyrians in Chicago (or Moscow, or Athens for that matter) don't speak Aramaic with each other today.