Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fascinating Quote On Use of the LXX in NT
#7
Charles Wilson Wrote:distazo-

I wanted to give this Post a few days without comment ("Go ahead, Charlie...Take a little longer..." <!-- s:yell: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/yell.gif" alt=":yell:" title="Yell" /><!-- s:yell: --> ).
I have a coupla' thoughts:

7. Stephen is Inspired and about to be Martyred. If the Septuagint is NOT correct in use then here is evidence of tampering at the very start.
Chapter 7 is very volatile for its content and its use through 2000 years. If it has been tampered with at the start, then what of the material that follows?
"There's something going on here".

Y/N/M?

Thank you Distazo and all,

CW
CW

There is nothing serious going on.
Hebrew Numbers are the first candidates to be lost or formed in time. If you compare the Samaritan OT, Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek etc, you'll see they are ALL very consistent and that a few exceptions can be explained, but, numbers for some reason, where not so easy and easily lost in time.

For instance, Jospehus information gives us a flood date of about +/1 3100 bc. This is in according to Maya sources as well.
Why does the MT give us something like 2700 bc? Some material for you to chew on.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://kiel0.home.xs4all.nl/genealogie_verschillen.htm">http://kiel0.home.xs4all.nl/genealogie_verschillen.htm</a><!-- m --> (differences in genealogy use translate.bing.com to read it in English)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Fascinating Quote On Use of the LXX in NT - by distazo - 10-22-2013, 05:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)