05-23-2013, 12:49 AM
I am glad you point out Matthew 28:11-15. History often get twisted by people and these people misguide others through their lies.
The history of Aramaic is much more certain than Hebrew, because of its historical background and Biblical background. In Genesis 31, we see Laban calling "witness pile" as "Jegar Sahadutha" which is Aramaic.
We see Jacob calling "Galeed" which is "believed" to be Old Hebrew. But I am not sure.
In Jewish Wars Book 6 Chapter 10, Josephus pointed out that the name Melchizedek is an Aramaic name which means the righteous king. Not Hebrew. Melchizedek lived during the time of Abraham (Genesis 14).
Early Old Testament books especially Moses' five books are believed to be written in Hebrew. But like you pointed out, there are no evidences to support it.
The history of Aramaic is much more certain than Hebrew, because of its historical background and Biblical background. In Genesis 31, we see Laban calling "witness pile" as "Jegar Sahadutha" which is Aramaic.
We see Jacob calling "Galeed" which is "believed" to be Old Hebrew. But I am not sure.
In Jewish Wars Book 6 Chapter 10, Josephus pointed out that the name Melchizedek is an Aramaic name which means the righteous king. Not Hebrew. Melchizedek lived during the time of Abraham (Genesis 14).
Early Old Testament books especially Moses' five books are believed to be written in Hebrew. But like you pointed out, there are no evidences to support it.