12-29-2012, 10:53 PM
ScorpioSniper2 Wrote:King James' sexuality could be another research topic, I guess.Actually, it's been disproven, that's just the rumour that these editors, whoever they are, are using for their justification of calling their revision what they call it. Here's a couple other reviews,
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/35014-the-queen-james-bible-and-homophobic-interpretations">http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/350 ... pretations</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2012/12/14/the-new-revised-perversion-bible/">http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/2012/12/ ... ion-bible/</a><!-- m -->