12-25-2012, 02:26 PM
Thinking outside of the box could help us to correct incorrect renderings which sometimes, as WE know, have been incorrectly rendered into Greek from the beginning.
Now, he has really a good point.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/57391137/3/The-Gospel-According-To-Luke-According-To-Luke-According-To-Luke">http://www.scribd.com/doc/57391137/3/Th ... ng-To-Luke</a><!-- m -->
Now, he has really a good point.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/57391137/3/The-Gospel-According-To-Luke-According-To-Luke-According-To-Luke">http://www.scribd.com/doc/57391137/3/Th ... ng-To-Luke</a><!-- m -->
Quote:The Targum of Jonathan has
21 occurrences of the passive verb ?
Ethkhazay
? and ?
Ethkhaza
? in former and latter Prophets ; none has the meaning ?
seemed ?, or ?it was fit, proper ?. It would ?appear? or ?seem?
( pun intended )
that the latter meaning is a rare one. In Luke 1:3, it also contradictsthe intention of Luke to employ that meaning. If I am right about Luke 1:3, Luke?s Gospel was probably written after John?s Gospel, since Luke refers to
The Word
as ?He? , a Person of Whomthe Apostles are ?eyewitnesses and servants?. He also ?appeared? to Luke.This refers plainly to John 1:1& 14. Luke would probably be the last of the four Gospels written, not John.