03-20-2011, 11:31 AM
He is considering that enoch is not just a true book, but an inspired one. i guess he was previously believing in the 66-Book canon. If you grew up with that (like i did) and put all your faith in it, it can bea quite interesting experience to find out there are other books like it.
My take is, enoch (and a lot of other apocryphical writings) might be true, but that doesn't make them inspired. The Bible is not the Bible because it is factually correct and contains words from true prophets, but because it is a perfect harmony.
My take is, enoch (and a lot of other apocryphical writings) might be true, but that doesn't make them inspired. The Bible is not the Bible because it is factually correct and contains words from true prophets, but because it is a perfect harmony.

