09-03-2010, 08:17 AM
shlama aaron
subject 1; word-numbers 7343,1798 and 11374
thank you for your reply
no, to me the question is misunderstood
the point is; that if originally in these three instances names are used
then it will be very helpfull to have access to the text where these names
can be recognised
now is to me the absurd situation that these names completely vanish
and in the case of the word for ; APELLES (fp0)
only two times (out of the 71 references)
and in the case of the word for; ANNAS (Nnx)
also only a few (out of the 167 references)
can be retrieved
so you see my point; is looks like that leading persons are no longer present
subject 2;word by word translation
is a word by word translation (aramaic to hebrew; or, aramaic to english) available
thank you
subject 1; word-numbers 7343,1798 and 11374
thank you for your reply
no, to me the question is misunderstood
the point is; that if originally in these three instances names are used
then it will be very helpfull to have access to the text where these names
can be recognised
now is to me the absurd situation that these names completely vanish
and in the case of the word for ; APELLES (fp0)
only two times (out of the 71 references)
and in the case of the word for; ANNAS (Nnx)
also only a few (out of the 167 references)
can be retrieved
so you see my point; is looks like that leading persons are no longer present
subject 2;word by word translation
is a word by word translation (aramaic to hebrew; or, aramaic to english) available
thank you