Peshitta Forum
New Testament in Hebrew - Printable Version

+- Peshitta Forum (http://peshitta.org/for)
+-- Forum: New Testament (http://peshitta.org/for/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Aramaic Bible Codes (http://peshitta.org/for/forumdisplay.php?fid=21)
+--- Thread: New Testament in Hebrew (/showthread.php?tid=1137)

Pages: 1 2


- Dave - 01-28-2005

Dave, what did you find in the hebrew text of the NT?


- gbausc - 01-31-2005

Nothing !

That's because I havn't done anything with it yet. It will take a long time to prepare the text for Codefinder, and frankly, I have more important things to do right now.

Since I have searched the Hebrew War and Peace extensively, the Greek NT and the KJV and Weymouth's NT Translation for codes and found nothing, I have little reason to believe a Hebrew translation of the NT will reveal anything; but one of these days, I will try it.

Blessings,

Dave


- Dave - 02-02-2005

Quote:Nothing !

That's because I havn't done anything with it yet. It will take a long time to prepare the text for Codefinder, and frankly, I have more important things to do right now.

Since I have searched the Hebrew War and Peace extensively, the Greek NT and the KJV and Weymouth's NT Translation for codes and found nothing, I have little reason to believe a Hebrew translation of the NT will reveal anything; but one of these days, I will try it.

Blessings,

Dave


Hmmm, I thought this over for a few days, and Dave, I find your answer evasive, and The Lord won't lie.

Of all the things that could be helpful to prove this peshitta primacy issue you have as your goal, you will not test an actual text that is known to have been translated from the greek into Hebrew?

That is quite odd Dave. Very, very odd. You, more than most on here, know how the majority of scholars throughout the years have dismissed the syriac texts as mere revisions of a greek text, but you won't try to prove them wrong with a text that actually has documentation of being translated from greek into Hebrew, knowing that syriac is a dialect of aramaic, the sister language of Hebrew?????

You have got to be kidding me Dave!!


- gbausc - 02-02-2005

Get real Dave,

"The Lord won't lie" means you won't ever make a mistake in judgement ?

You are a simpleton , Dave.
We have nothing more to say to each other.


- Dave - 02-02-2005

Quote:Get real Dave,

"The Lord won't lie" means you won't ever make a mistake in judgement ?

You are a simpleton , Dave.
We have nothing more to say to each other.

Hmmmm, the guy calls me a name and then runs off pouting like a little kid, quite interesting!

My judgement is completely sound Dave, and you just proved it little man by calling me that little childish name. What's a matter, did you test it already and find that it did prove something and now you are avoiding talking about it? That would be quite the blow to all this code crap you have been promoting, huh?!

You know what Dave, I'm 40 years old and I have crossed 70% of this world while in the Navy, and your antics are not new to me, that's why you don't fool me, I've seen you through many faces before.

Go ahead Dave, promote your agenda.


Thou that judgest - gbausc - 02-06-2005

Hmmmm, the guy calls me a name and then runs off pouting like a little kid, quite interesting!

My judgement is completely sound Dave, and you just proved it little man by calling me that little childish name. What's a matter, did you test it already and find that it did prove something and now you are avoiding talking about it? That would be quite the blow to all this Spirit filled crap you have been promoting, huh?!

You know what Dave, I'm 52 years old and I have crossed paths with hundreds of Christians in my preaching ministry, and your antics are not new to me, that's why you don't fool me, I've seen you through many faces before.

Go ahead Dave, promote your agenda.

Right back at ya , Dave, where it belongs.


- Dave - 02-06-2005

Heh, this guy.

Your cup is too full Dave. You could have tested that text but you didn't. One of the best times to see if the syric text would stand on it's own, but you pawn it off as nothing. Any other time your adament about proving this text on here.

It's to your detriment not mine Dave. I copied your response to it and saved it.